Archive for Category: Blog
Trump’s Presidency Will Affect Nuclear Energy Investments

November 18, 2016 | no comments | Blog | by: Sean Dougherty

investing in energyNo matter the outcome of any one presidential election, reports show that about 90% of the existing nuclear reactors in the country are soon due to be relicensed for an additional 20 years, some for as long as 40 years — far outlasting the tenure of any president. Furthermore, the U.S. is projected to remain the biggest global producer of nuclear power for 10 more years at the very least; that is, until China completes their 100 planned new nuclear units.

Yet now that the results of the election are in, we can begin to predict how the country will be investing in energy companies on a macro scale, and investing in nuclear energy in particular, over the years to come. President-elect Donald Trump has been a vocal advocate of nuclear investments for America, saying as far back as 2011 that he is “in favor of nuclear energy — very strongly in favor of nuclear energy.”

Trump has also touted nuclear power as a viable path to free the U.S. of foreign energy dependency, one of the key issues of his platform.

“It should be the goal of the American people and their government to achieve energy independence as soon as possible. Nuclear power is a valuable source of energy and should be part of an all-the-above program for providing power for America long into the future,” the president-elect has said.

The Republican president-to-be is also largely in favor of deregulating the energy sector across the board, which could result in significant gains for those investing in energy and in nuclear energy stocks. His goal is to remove the current red tape that may impede energy innovation and exploration, including among publicly traded nuclear power companies.

On the other hand, Trump has also faced widespread criticism for his laissez-faire environmental policies, total disregard for slowing the pace of climate change, and disinterest in complying with international eco-friendly commitments. Gas drilling and coal initiatives could increase under a Trump presidency, while government-supported efforts to bolster solar and wind power may fall by the wayside.

Yet as an affordable, practical, and entirely emission-free source of energy, nuclear power could prove an easy compromise between energy that is both “green,” efficient, and free of foreign dependence.

It’s impossible to predict the future, especially under the always-unpredictable Donald Trump; however, experts say the future of the nuclear industry looks bright.

FAQs on Nuclear Energy, Answered

November 16, 2016 | no comments | Blog | by: Sean Dougherty

investing in energy

Nuclear energy is a emerging resource that can be used in lieu of climate change-inducing fossil fuels. However, there are many unknown details about this form of energy, so here are some frequently asked questions about nuclear energy to better explain this process.

Q: What is nuclear energy?

Nuclear power plants split uranium atoms inside a reactor through a process called fission. The heat that is produced comes in the form of steam, which then spins a turbine to generate electricity.

Q: How does this form of energy compare to fossil fuels?

Nuclear energy sources are much smaller than any form of fossil fuel. One pellet of uranium, the size of a fingernail, contains the same amount of energy as 17,000 cubic feet of natural gas, 1,780 pounds of coal, of 149 gallons of oil. This makes it exceptionally cost-effective and efficient. Plus, nuclear energy does not produce any greenhouse gases.

Q: Is nuclear energy renewable?

Generally, a renewable resource uses a limitless supply of sun, wind, or water. Nuclear energy must use the element uranium, so it can be considered a somewhat sustainable energy source; there is enough uranium on our planet to fuel reactors for more than 100 years.

Q: Are there reactors worldwide?

Yes, as of right now there are more than 436 nuclear reactors in over 30 different countries. In the United States alone, there are 61.

Q: Do nuclear power plants release radioactive material?

Yes, but only in small quantities approved by the federal government. However, the plant stores this waste until the radioactivity level decreases to a safe amount so those around the plant will not be affected.

Q: How do nuclear energy plants benefit the economy?

Every dollar spent by a nuclear reactor will bring $1.04 back into the local economy, $1.18 to the state, and $1.87 to the federal economy. The industry also creates jobs with both the construction and maintaining of the plant.

Q: Why should I be investing in energy companies?

As the amount of fossil fuels becomes depleted, it is more important than ever to find other forms of energy. Investing in nuclear energy stocks and companies is a fantastic economic choice, since the need for nuclear energy will only grow from now.

Have any questions about investing in energy companies and stocks? Contact our professionals today to get started.

4 Advantages of Investing in Nuclear Energy Right Now

November 14, 2016 | no comments | Blog | by: Sean Dougherty

 nuclear energy investmentNuclear energy is going through a major resurgence in popularity, especially when it comes to nuclear energy investment. While nuclear energy cannot be created or destroyed, it can be converted from one form to another, as this energy is released from the nucleus of the atom. When a controlled nuclear reaction occurs, either through fusion or fission, it produces a large amount of energy that can be used instead of non renewable resources like oil and gas.

Investing in nuclear energy stocks can be beneficial for investors across the globe. Here are four major advantages of nuclear energy investment for the 21st century.

1. Reduces your carbon footprint

Nuclear energy brings with it lower greenhouse gas emissions as this form of energy does not release any gases into the environment. Additionally, there is no adverse impact on water, land, or habitats with the creation of this form of energy.

2. Reliable

Other forms of alternative energy sources aren’t always as reliable, especially resources dependent on favorable weather conditions. Solar and wind plants need specific conditions to produce large amounts of energy; however, nuclear energy can be produced even within the roughest weather conditions.

3. Cost effective

The cost of uranium, the element that is used as fuel in the nuclear energy process, is incredibly lower than other forms of energy. Plus, one kilogram of natural uranium will produce about 20,000 times as much energy as the same amount of coal, so your dollar will be stretched to a new level with this product. Also, a nuclear reactor can last up to 60 years if maintained properly, which makes the cost of producing electricity incredibly low over its lifetime.

4. Easy transportation

Nuclear energy requires less raw material than other sources. For example, 28 grams of uranium produces as much energy as 100 metric tons of coal. Not only that, but since nuclear energy is required in small quantities, total transportation costs are comparably very low.

All in all, there are many benefits to nuclear investment that can bring many advantages to companies across the globe. If you have any additional questions about nuclear energy investment, do not hesitate to contact our experts today.

How Recent U.S. Nuclear Construction Activity is Paving the Way for Better Use of Alternative Energy

November 4, 2016 | no comments | Blog | by: Sean Dougherty

nuclear energy investmentThere are 100 commercial nuclear reactors operating within 60 power plants in the U.S. alone. On average, these reactors are about 34 years old, while the oldest, Nine Mile Point Unit 1 and Oyster Creek, have been in use since December 1969.

Although the nation has been investing in energy — specifically clean, alternative forms — for quite some time, there is still a high demand for non-fossil fuel energy sources.

Investing in nuclear energy is clearly nothing new, but despite the age of the existing nuclear energy plants and reactors, there are new reactors being built even today.

In June 2016, Watts Bar Unit 2 began its initial operation in Tennessee. This is the first nuclear reactor to come online in the U.S. since 1996. It is expected to begin its commercial operations by the end of this year.

Additionally, Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are currently being constructed in Georgia and Virgil C. Summer Units 2 and 3 are being built in South Carolina.

Since the shutdown of four reactors in 2013, and since Vermont Yankee was removed from service in 2014, the U.S. nuclear industry has dipped. But as of recently, it’s been making a comeback.

Nuclear power has generated roughly 20% of U.S. electricity since 1990. As the power plants continue to undergo modifications, they have been able to increase their capacities and shorten their offline times.

While there are some risks in nuclear energy investment, the rewards are much greater with proper monitoring. Nuclear power plant investments could drastically reduce the global need for fossil fuels, which have been proven to harm the environment and are available in finite amounts.

While the U.S. only holds five percent of the world’s population, it burns nearly a quarter of the Earth’s fossil fuels, creating greenhouse gasses, as well as air pollutants such as nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, volatile organic compounds, and heavy metals.

Nuclear energy is a contained form of energy generation, and therefore does not produce the same types of pollutants that harm the environment. Of course, nuclear reactions do create radioactive byproducts, which must be monitored closely.

Regular radiation detection and measurement is especially important when it comes to nuclear energy investment. While the radiation can be dangerous, if controlled, nuclear energy is some of the most effective forms of energy generated today.

Recent TED Talk Urges Public to Embrace Nuclear Power Without Fear

November 2, 2016 | no comments | Blog | by: Sean Dougherty

publicly traded nuclear companies

The fear of nuclear power is almost definitely hurting the environment much more than nuclear energy itself ever could.

A recent TED Talk by Michael Shellenberger, an environmental policy expert and co-founder of the Breakthrough Institute, highlighted some of the reasons why nuclear power is the next logical step in alternative energy sources — and why our fears of nuclear energy are often misplaced.

Some people think that the idea of nuclear energy investment means supporting a destructive, dangerous source of power that can harm our environment. In reality, nuclear power has the lowest carbon content of any fuel source studied by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Its carbon content is even lower than that of solar power, the golden child of alternate energy.

It’s also far more consistent than other sources of energy, like wind or solar, which depend on Mother Nature to produce electricity. In contrast, nuclear power plant investment can lead to development of highly efficient sources of energy. One plant can provide power 92% of the time, and nuclear plants can operate 24/7 without being affected by adverse weather conditions.

But some people still won’t consider investing in publicly traded nuclear companies because they’re afraid of the waste or meltdown potential. But knowledgeable and experienced professionals like Bill Gates are currently developing new reactors that won’t melt down. In addition, investing in nuclear energy does not lead to a colossal amount of radioactive waste. Shellenberger stated that “if you take all the nuclear waste we’ve ever made in the United States, put it on a football field, stacked it up, it would only reach 20 feet high.” The waste that exists is subject to radiation detection and measurement.

More than anything, it’s our fear of nuclear power that has caused more harm to our planet. According to Shellenberger, our country prematurely retired nuclear power plants and replaced them with fossil fuels. These fossil fuels create an overwhelmingly negative impact on the environment, so much so that it essentially negates any clean energy we’ve gotten from solar power. And the World Health Organization found that it’s the fear of accidents that caused the most harm in those situations. The resulting panic is what led to the most damage — not the nuclear power or radiation.

Currently, nuclear power supplies more than 11% of the world’s electricity, but advocates like Shellenberger hope that this number will increase significantly in the near future. Although other sources of energy have their place, investing in publicly traded nuclear companies can lead to much cleaner and more powerful sources of energy.

If you’re interested in exploring investment opportunities in publicly traded nuclear companies, contact us today for more information. You can play an integral role in providing widespread access to efficient and safe nuclear energy.

3 Enlightening Advantages to Nuclear Energy

October 31, 2016 | no comments | Blog | by: Sean Dougherty

investing in energy companies

Global warming has become a hot topic in recent years, which has prompted scientists, politicians, and the general public to spend time exploring and investing in energy for alternate fuel options. One such option is nuclear energy. Investing in energy companies will help to further develop methods and viable ways we can harness nuclear power. When we invest in nuclear energy, we invest in our future. If you’re still wondering about some of the advantages to using nuclear power and how investing in nuclear energy can benefit our world, here are three enlightening assets to using this energy resource:

  • Reduced greenhouse gases
    Nuclear energy has one of the lowest environmental impacts of any power source. This is because carbon dioxide and methane — the gases responsible for the greenhouse effect — are not released during the process. In addition, there is no negative impact on land, water, or animal habitats as a result of nuclear energy use. Essentially, nuclear energy investment is an eco-friendly move.
  • Powerful and reliable
    Nuclear energy is an extremely efficient and powerful resource. Investing in nuclear companies will help develop technological advances that can further cement nuclear energy’s status as one of the most productive sources of alternate energy. Other alternate sources tend to be quite limited and those who use them often have to settle for less efficiency. But nuclear plants can operate constantly and will not be affected by weather conditions. With nuclear power, no one is forced to sacrifice power performance.
  • Cost-effective
    Nuclear energy has a considerably low fuel cost, and the cost of generating electricity is quite low. Although the set-up cost of a nuclear power plant is substantial, the cost of running that plant is small. The US Nuclear Energy Institute states that the cost of uranium — the material that allows nuclear power to be created — represents only 14% of a plant’s cost. Compared to the overall cost percentage of fuel for coal plants (78%) and gas plants (89%), the cost efficiency is clearly seen. And because it’s possible to generate a large amount of energy within one plant, a single power plant investment can go a long way in terms of energy production. In addition, nuclear reactors can operate successfully for up to 60 years, which means you won’t be faced with high set-up costs or constant replacements.

Nuclear power is the indisputable next step for our planet’s energy sources. Investing in energy companies will help make this beneficial power source a reality. If you’re interested in learning more about the power of nuclear energy or investing in energy companies, contact us today for more information.

The Federal Government Needs To Do More To Protect Nuclear Industry From Drones

October 27, 2016 | no comments | Blog | by: Sean Dougherty

nuclear investmentHere’s something scary: within a span of two months in 2014, drones flew around France’s nuclear facilities at least 32 times. We still don’t know who was responsible, which is exceptionally worrisome as commercial drones are becoming a fact of life.

It is no secret that technology around us is evolving at a rapid pace. Since commercial drones are becoming commonplace, more needs to be done to protect nuclear facilities from threats.

Typically, drones are often used by utility companies for a variety of tasks such as checking power lines and inspecting storm damage. However, security experts warn that drones could also be used to threaten the security of nuclear power plants. Currently, there are 99 operating commercial nuclear reactors at 61 nuclear power plants across the nation.

Why? The concerns started in 2015 when the Federal Aviation Administration released new rules clearing the way for commercial drones. After feeling threatened, prominent members of the nuclear energy sector grew incredibly nervous as these rules weren’t deemed safe. At the time, David Kline, the director of security with the U.S. Nuclear Institute, called the FAA’s rules “insufficient”.

Kline suggested adding a provision to ban drone operators from flying within a three-mile radius of any nuclear power plant, which would prevent them from accessing confidential, sensitive information.

“Although NEI is not aware of any unauthorized flights of [drones] at or near U.S. commercial nuclear power plants, the present FAA regulatory regime and the Proposed Rule are not sufficient to address such flights,” Kline said.

The good news is that along with the U.S. Department of Transportation, the FAA has recently implemented a new set of rules that will bring clarity to the nuclear industry. The regulations will not allow commercial use of drones at night, flying of drones over people, or flying drones beyond the visual eye of sight.

With the threat of climate change, there is a growing interest in investing in nuclear energy. Nuclear investment has been shown to be a great alternative to fossil fuels, as the growing world population is causing a demand for electricity that cannot be met.

If you are looking for more information concerning nuclear investment and publicly traded nuclear companies, be sure to contact U.S. Nuclear Corp.

Common Myths About Nuclear Power, Debunked

October 21, 2016 | no comments | Blog | by: Sean Dougherty

investing in energyOverall, a slim majority of Americans — 51% — favor the use of nuclear energy for domestic electrical use, while 43% oppose it. No doubt this is thanks in part to the many myths floating around about the use of nuclear power. In order to prevent any misconceptions that might be preventing the U.S. from investing in energy, here are some common myths that surround nuclear power and nuclear investment.

Myth: Americans are constantly surrounded by nuclear energy and radiation given off from nuclear power plants.
This is false. While Americans are constantly surrounded by natural occurring radiation, only 0.005% is due to nuclear power. This number is roughly 100 times less than what we’re exposed to from coal, 200 times less than a cross country flight, and about the same as eating one banana a year. All in all, nuclear power plants pose very little threat to the American people, especially when compared to other energy sources.

Myth: Nuclear power causes global warming and climate change.
Untrue! In fact, if we take away the barriers to investing in energy, nuclear power could drastically reduce emissions from power plants. That’s because nuclear power plants do not emit any greenhouse gases during operation. Plus, nuclear power plants require less land use than solar and wind power sources.

Myth: A nuclear reactor can explode like a nuclear bomb.
It is impossible for a nuclear plant to explode like the nuclear bombs used in war. This is because those weapons contain specialized, advanced materials that have been configured by a nuclear scientist to be harmful. None of these materials are present in a nuclear reactor. Plus, it is important to note that the nuclear reactors that exploded in Chernobyl have never been manufactured outside of the Soviet Union, so this threat is not relevant to our nation.

Myth: Nuclear waste cannot be recycled.
Many believe that the waste produced from nuclear reactors cannot be recycled, so it will end up in our atmosphere. This is untrue, and fully 96% of all nuclear waste is reused and/or recycled.

Myth: Investing in energy companies is a waste of time.
Actually, many experts believe that the future belongs to nuclear power. More and more Americans are noticing the benefits that come with nuclear energy investment as an emerging field in the stock market.

Are you interested in investing in energy companies? Contact our professionals today to get informed on the latest nuclear energy stocks available to investors.

U.S. Dept of Energy Announces Plan to Sell Depleted Uranium for Enriching Civil Nuclear Power

August 21, 2016 | no comments | Blog | by: Sean Dougherty

nuclear investmentThe U.S. Department of Energy’s Loan Programs Office announced in December of 2014 that it opened a $12.6 billion loan guarantee for advanced nuclear technologies. This includes small modular reactors, molten salt reactors, and breeder reactors.

It also looks as if the agency is putting that money towards uranium as well. In a recent announcement, the Department of Energy has agreed to sell depleted uranium to GE-Hitachi Global Laser Enrichment, LLC (GLE) over a 40 year period. The facility would then use this depleted uranium to produce natural uranium, the element that is used in the production of fuel for civil nuclear reactors.

The $1 billion facility would be built near the Department of Energy’s DOE’s Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant in western Kentucky and is slated to bring between 800 and 1,200 jobs to the area.

GLE will construct, finance, and operate the existing Paducah Laser Enrichment Facility, which is adjacent to the Gaseous Diffusion Plant. Under a Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the facility will serve as a commercial uranium enrichment production plant. As of right now, the uranium in question is safely stored in 65,000 specialized storage units at the Department’s Paducah location and Portsmouth, Ohio site.

“This agreement furthers the Energy Department’s environmental cleanup mission while reducing cleanup costs, creating good local jobs, and supporting an economical enrichment enterprise for our energy needs,” said Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz. “The sale contributes to two key Energy Department mission areas – to fulfill the federal government’s responsibility to manage the safe storage and disposal of nuclear materials and to enable nuclear power, America’s largest source of zero-carbon energy and an important enabler for reduced greenhouse gas emissions.”

The Paducah plant was built in the 1950s in order to enrich uranium for national security applications and was later used to enrich uranium for nuclear power generation. The Department of Energy took over the plant enrichment facilities in 2014.

This trade deal is especially beneficial for those interested in nuclear investment. Considering the fact that the government planned a deal that’s set to last 40 years means that they only envision nuclear energy to grow. This means investing in nuclear energy stocks, power plant investment, and nuclear investment as a whole will only reap many benefits in the future.

US Nuclear Reports Record 3rd Quarter 2015 Financial Results

November 13, 2015 | no comments | 2015 Financial Results Blog | by: ian@overhoff.com

    Los Angeles, CA. November 12, 2015 – US Nuclear Corp. (OTCBB: UCLE), a leading manufacturer of advanced radiation detection equipment for the nuclear energy industry, scientific laboratories, U.S. military, U.S. Government Agencies, Hospitals, and international nuclear reactor facilities announced financial results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2015.

Read more →